JE ME CONTENTERAI CE SOIR DE VOUS INCITER A SIGNER CES PÉTITIONS CONTRE CETTE HORREUR QUI S' APPELLE VIVISECTION ET QUE JE SUIS SURE COMME BCP D' ENTRE NOUS AIMERIEZ VOIR CESSER
L' UNION EUROPÉENNE NOUS DONNE CETTE CHANCE DE FAIRE ENTENDRE NOTRE VOIX POUR CEUX QUI N' EN ONT PAS.
LA PLUS IMPORTANTE A SIGNER ....C' EST LA PREMIÈRE EN ROSE.
DES MILLIERS D' ANIMAUX SONT TORTURES DANS DES SOUFFRANCE INDESCRIPTIBLES PAR DES HUMAINS QUI N'ONT AUCUNE EMPATHIE ET QUI SAVENT TRÈS BIEN QUE LES TESTS SONT INUTILES!!!!!! ILS NE MÈNENT A AUCUN RÉSULTAT ALORS QUE D' AUTRE MOYENS QUI NE TUENT PAS EXISTENT.
ET PIRE.....LA PLUPART SONT RIDICULES.
IL EST ÉVIDENT QUE FAIRE INHALER DES POISONS AURA FINALEMENT RAISON DE VOTRE SYSTÈME RESPIRATOIRE!!
ET CERTAINS SONT ENCORE PLUS RIDICULES!!!!!
LES ANIMAUX QUI LES SUBISSENT SONT DES LAPINS POUR LES COSMETIQUES, DESC CHIENS DES PRIMATES POUR LES SUSTANCES TOXIQUES
DE FAIT CES TESTS SUR ANIMAUX RETARDENT TOUTE AUTRE RECHERCHE SUR CELLULES PLUS ADAPTÉE.... ET C' EST SIMPLEMENT POUR LE FRIC!!!!
NOTRE TEMPS D' ACTION EST LIMITE DONS IL FAUT SIGNER ET PARTAGER AU PLUS VITE ET AU PLUS GRAND NOMBRE
MERCI!!!
TONY ZADEL A PRÉPARÉ SUR SA PAGE FACEBOOK CE DOSSIER SUR LA VIVISECTION AVEC CES PÉTITIONS A SIGNER
VIDÉOS EN BLEU ET ARTICLES A LIRE
PLEASE SIGN & SHARE WIDELY THESE 7 VIP PETITIONS✦THERE ARE ESSENTIAL !!
►PET.1https://e-activist.com/
►PET.2 http://www.change.org/
►PET.3 https://www.change.org/
►PET.4 http://
►PET.5 http://www.proanima.fr/
(for other language go to:http://www.proanima.fr/en/
►PET.6 http://www.gopetition.com/
►PET.7 https://
(3 petitions are from The "Comité scientifique Pro Anima" France
*Pro Anima is an international research association. based in France in STRASBOURG)
✦CHAPTER ONE:LEGALLY POISONED TO DEATH AS PICTURED !!!
-------------------
The Truth About REACH Animal Testing !Regulatory agencies in the U.S.—including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Food and Drug Administration—as well as regulatory agencies in the European Union and elsewhere in the world require chemicals, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and many other products to be tested for toxicity. Animals are forced to ingest or inhale—or are injected with—toxic substances such as gasoline components and mercury. Animals used in these tests suffer extreme pain before they are killed, dissected, and thrown away like garbage !!
✦What is REACH?
-REACH is a new European Community Regulation on chemicals and their safe use (EC 1907/2006). Its title stands for the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemical substances. The aim of REACH is to improve the protection of human health and the environment through the better and earlier identification of the risky nature of chemical substances.
✦What has REACH got to do with animal testing?
-REACH seeks to assess the safety of chemicals for human health and the environment, so tests need to be carried out to see what impact they have. The experiments used to assess the safety of chemicals are called toxicity tests, which traditionally involve the poisoning of guinea pigs, rabbits, birds, fish, rats and mice, although many non-animal alternatives now exist.
✦How many animals will be used in chemical safety tests?
-Between 13 and 54 million animals could be used in the EU under REACH to test the safety of an estimated 30,000 or more chemicals between 2009 and 2018.
✦What kinds of animal experiments are carried out to test chemicals?
-Toxicity tests involve force-feeding animals high doses of chemicals many become seriously ill.. The animals are always killed as part of the test if they do not die as a result of it. Tests may involve two-generation studies where pregnant animals are poisoned so the effects of the chemical can be seen in the babies.
The first proposed test under REACH was for an industrial lubricant, and involved force-feeding pregnant rats high doses of chemicals and killing them just before they are due to give birth.
✦If we don't test on animals how can we ensure chemicals are safe?
-The ECEAE(The European Coalition to End Animal Experiment) believes animals do not need to be used for chemicals testing, and published a report entitled ‘The Way Forward: A Non-Animal Testing Strategy for Chemicals’, which demonstrated how chemicals could be safely tested without having to use animals.
Ways to avoid animal tests include using humane alternatives, looking at human safety data and avoiding duplication of animal testing by sharing data on chemical tests that have already been carried out.
✦How can we minimise animal testing under REACH?
-Many of the thousands of chemicals to be evaluated under REACH have already been privately animal-tested years ago by the companies that manufacture them. Thanks to the ECEAE's campaign, data-sharing is now a central feature of the legislation and there are penalties for companies that don’t comply.
✦How can we stop animal testing from taking place now that the legislation has been passed?
-REACH legislation states that some of the test proposals that are submitted to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) must be open to public scrutiny for 45 days. This gives ECEAE scientists a window of opportunity to provide information from other sources which might prevent the test happening, and save animals from awful suffering and death. We've already been able to suggest alternatives to the first animal testing proposals - we will have commented on all 21 proposals by the end of 2010 - and will be scrutinising further proposals as they are released.
✦Are the chemical companies using alternatives to animal tests?
-Thanks to five years of intensive ECEAE lobbying, the use of alternatives has been placed centrally in the legislation. Article 1 specifically states that one of the aims of REACH is the ‘promotion of alternative methods of assessment of hazards of substances.’
This means that the chemical companies must use alternatives to animal tests where they are available, and puts an impetus on the European Union to develop and validate new alternatives. The ECEAE will be paying close attention to ensure that alternatives to cruel animal poisoning tests are used whenever possible. A huge shift in culture is still needed.
✦Cosmetics have chemicals in them, so how does REACH effect the cosmetics testing ban?
-REACH legislation contains a concession that the Cosmetics Directive, which bans animal tests for cosmetics, takes precedence over REACH for cosmetic ingredients.
On this basis, we argue that this means that if a substance was animal-tested for any reason under REACH from March 2009 (when the Cosmetics Directive came into force), it could not subsequently be used in a cosmetic. However, we have a real battle on our hands to make sure that the legislation is applied properly.
There are in addition currently unresolved issues about particular types of testing that could be permitted even for cosmetics (e.g. environmental testing or worker safety), on which the ECEAE is seeking clarification.
✦READ MORE HERE AND IF YOU CAN DONATE TO THIS FUND AND SUSCRIBE FOR NEWS & ACTIONS:
►http://www.eceae.org/en/
✦PLEASE WATCH THIS INFORMATIEVE VIDEO WHO EXPLAIN ALL IN DETAILS:
We have campaigned against the REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) legislation since before it became law, because, like many of the animal protection groups, we were very concerned at the huge increase in animal testing that it would cause.Despite the concerns, it passed into law in 2007 and is currently being rolled out across Europe. Here we try to explain why we are so worried about REACH animal testing and why consumers should be aware of this largely unknown legislation.
HERE:▬▬►http://youtu.be/
✦CHAPTER 2
----------------
✦ ✦ WHY IT IS SO IMPORTANT ?
➨ ➨ We have until 2018 to save up to 54 million animals from being poisoned and killed !
Up to 54 million animals will be poisoned, some to death, in the EU between now and 2018 to assess the safety of chemicals for humans.
✦The European chemical testing programme, REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemical substances), aims to establish whether an estimated 30,000 or more chemicals on the market are safe for humans and the environment, and to control the use of those judged to present a risk.
The experiments used to assess the safety of chemicals are called toxicity tests, which traditionally involve the poisoning of guinea pigs, rabbits, fish, birds, rats and mice.
✦Poisoned to death!
-The European Commission backed plans to poison millions of animals to test these chemicals. Their initial proposals failed to mention anything about alternatives to animal testing or the sharing of data. In response, the ECEAE launched a campaign to stop this mass suffering, proposing instead humane, reliable and biologically relevant non-animal testing methods.
✦You can help! We need to save as many animals as possible from being poisoned and killed for chemicals testing.➨ ➨ PLEASE ACT NOW BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE !!!!!!!!
✦Read more in these links below:
http://www.peta.org/
✦https://www.lushusa.com/
✦http://
✦http://ec.europa.eu/
✦http://
✦And here:http://www.cov.com/files/
✦Please spread these infos & petitions by sharing the page thx ! ✦https://www.facebook.com/
Thank you ~Tony Zadel, Copyright(©)
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire