vendredi 25 octobre 2013

IL Y A PLUS DE SOUFFRANCE DANS UN VERRE DE LAIT QUE DANS UN STEAK

C' EST MALHEUREUSEMENT VRAI, ET BIEN SUR UNE GROSSE SURPRISE DÉSAGRÉABLE (POUR CEUX QUI AIMENT LES ANIMAUX) DE REALISER POURQUOI LA CONSOMMATION DE LAIT PRÉSENTÉ COMME L' ALIMENT IN-DIS-PEN-SABLE POUR LA SANTÉ, LE BLA BLA SUR LE CALCIUM ET L' OSTÉOPOROSE ENTRE AUTRE... PEUT REPRÉSENTER TANT DE PEINES ET DE SOUFFRANCE POUR LA VACHE... ET LA MORT DU VEAU MALE

QUAND VOUS AUREZ LU ET COMPRIS  CE QU' IL FAUT FAIRE POUR OBTENIR CE LAIT

(INSÉMINATION -VIOL DE LA VACHE- GESTATION LONGUE ET SANS SOIN OU ATTENTION PARTICULIERS, MISE BAS, ARRACHEMENT DU VEAU A LA NAISSANCE, ÉLOIGNEMENT DU VEAU QUI NE VERRA JAMAIS  SA MÈRE ET SERA GARDÉ DANS LE NOIR OU EN TOUS CAS L' OBSCURITÉ PENDANT QUELQUES SEMAINES SANS ACCÈS A L' EXTÉRIEUR, PUIS  ABATTAGE DU VEAU SI C' EST UN MÂLE APRÈS 10 SEMAINES SOUVENT OU ALORS PUS TARD SI LE FERMIER EST CLÉMENT, MAIS RARE.. LA VACHE EST DE NOUVEAU INSÉMINÉE  DES QUE POSSIBLE POUR RECOMMENCER UN CYCLE DE VOL DE LAIT.. CAR IL S' AGIT DE CELA :VOLER LE LAIT DESTINE AU VEAU POUR EN NOURRIR LES HUMAINS, ABATTAGE DE LA VACHE QUI PRODUIT MOINS DE LAIT QUE VOULU!!  ELLES VIVENT  DE 3 A 5 ANS ET SONT ÉPUISÉES A CET ÂGE  MÊME SI POURTANT  C' EST ENCORE JEUNE-DURÉE MOYENNE NORMALE DE VIE 20 ANS-  ET FINISSENT EN STEAK!!!)

JE PENSE QUE VOUS VERREZ LES FAITS SOUS UN ÉCLAIRAGE DIFFÉRENT ET PENSEREZ TOUT AU MOINS A NE PAS GÂCHER LE LAIT, OU MIEUX OU LIMITER OU ARRÊTER LA CONSOMMATION DE PRODUITS LAITIERS

SOURCE

Milk of Human Kindness Denied to Dairy Cows




Dairy Cow
Dairy Cow (Photo credit: USDAgov)
Recent reports of mothers purchasing tainted breast milk online has sparked a discussion not only about regulating the underground trade in breast milk, but the legitimacy of human “milk sharing” in the first place.
Although considerable evidence shows that breast milk is much healthier than formula, critics of the practice still find donating breast milk to be problematic.  As one milk donor summarized a common reaction in a Huffington Post piece: ”Ewww, it’s weird.” The “ick” response only intensifies when the issue involves human adults drinking human breast milk.
Interestingly, few consumers who are offended by the traffic in human breast milk have a problem with drinking milk from cows. Given that drinking the milk of one’s own species provides the most natural source of nutrition known to mammalian life, it’s strange–or perhaps just a testament to the marketing geniuses in the milk industry–that everyday consumers of conventional bovine milk rarely pause to ponder the implications of supping on the stolen secretions of another species.
“Many of us assume that milk is as innocuous a product as an apple,” writes Sherry Colb, Professor of Law and Charles Evans Hughes Scholar at Cornell University School of Law. “We have absorbed this message repeatedly from a very early age.” And as Gary Francione, Distinguished Professor of Law at Rutgers, has famously said, “There is probably more suffering in a glass of milk than a pound of steak.”
Perhaps the most unpleasant fact to consider about cows’ milk destined for human consumption is that it almost certainly required a heifer’s forced impregnation. Female cows are strapped to a rack (industry slang refers to the device as a “rape rack”) and inseminated with semen stored in a massive syringe. There are 9 million dairy cows in the United States.  Nearly every one of them suffers immensely from this experience.
Left to her own devices after giving birth, a mother cow would feed her calf for nine to twelve months (not to mention play with her calf, teach her calf, protect her calf, and nuzzle her calf). But because the cow’s milk has been reserved for human consumption, the calf is forcibly removed from the mother soon (and sometimes immediately) after birth. Mother cows have highly developed emotions. They will bellow for days, pace the spot where they gave birth, and stop eating. Then they’ll produce a season’s worth of milk and be led straight back to the rape rack.
The mother’s offspring, depending on sex, will face one of two fates. Male dairy calves become “veal calves.” Some of them are slaughtered while only a few days old, others within a few months–it all depends on the kind of meat desired by the market. Because of this connection, boycotting veal–a boutique expression of consumer awareness–is a pointless gesture if dairy products aren’t boycotted as well. The female dairy calves, for their part, follow in their mothers’ footsteps. They’re fattened and prepared for impregnation at the age of fourteen months.
The normal lifespan of a female cow is around 20 years old. The typical dairy cow, who goes through several rounds of forced impregnations, experiences a drop in milk production after five years. Dairy farmers cannot survive financially unless heifers are producing milk at maximum capacity. As a result, dairy cows not only routinely develop mastitis, but they enter the gates of the abattoir somewhere between the ages of 5-7. The vast majority of the nation’s cheap hamburger meat comes from the bodies of these “spent” dairy cows.
The cycle described here has nothing to do with scale. It happens on family farms and on factory farms. It’s endemic to the project of forcing one species to produce milk for another. It’s a reality that escapes milk carton narratives and Got Milk billboards. It’s as systematically exploitative as anything humans do.
And it’s certainly a lot weirder than drinking human milk.

Aucun commentaire: