LE MAUVAIS ARGUMENT DES VIANDARDS... LES CANINES!!! NOS CANINES A NOUS HUMAINS

SOURCE AVEC PHOTOS


 STUPIDE!! LA PLUPART DES HERBIVORES EN ONT!!!



One of the most common defenses of meat-eating that vegans encounter is, “If I wasn’t meant to eat meat, then I wouldn’t have these canine teeth!” It’s a comment that’s often tossed out after a meat-eater has been confronted with information about animal farming cruelty, or with the fact that humans have no biological need for meat, milk or eggs. But there are several serious problems with the “canine teeth” argument, the most glaring one being that the premise, “the presence of canine teeth = meant to eat meat,” is completely inaccurate. In truth, with the exception of rodents, rabbits, and pikas, nearly all mammals have canine teeth. In fact, several herbivores have ferocious canine teeth, and, as you’ll see in the gallery below, the largest canine teeth of any land animal belong to a true herbivore.
Another problem with the “canine teeth” argument is the idea that, just because we have a physical attribute that enables us to do something harmful, we are morally entitled to perform that activity whenever we want. Humans are physically capable of inflicting all kinds of violence, but our capacity to harm others has nothing to do with whether or not we are right to harm others. Indeed, most people would say it is wrong to cause harm when you can just as easily avoid doing so. And we can drastically reduce the harm and death we cause other animals simply by making different choices at the grocery store.
Check out the photo gallery below for more reasons why our canine teeth don’t make us meat-eaters, and for surprising images of some stunningly fang-tastic herbivores.